Choose the company analysis
Paste a YouTube link covering NVIDIA, Tesla or another company you're researching.
A bullish headline tells you little about the assumptions behind it. Ask a YouTube stock analysis about earnings, valuation, downside risks and catalysts. Get a source-backed answer and jump to the moment where the analyst explains their case.
For company research across the YouTube analysts you choose.
Show a real company-analysis video beside the question “What assumptions support this valuation?” and a short cited answer. Make the assumption, timeframe and clickable timestamp legible. Avoid price charts or targets that imply live market data.
How it works
Paste a YouTube link covering NVIDIA, Tesla or another company you're researching.
Ask what supports the valuation, what could go wrong or what the speaker expects to happen next.
Use the cited timestamps to review the reasoning before you draw your own conclusion.
Use your questions to examine the case presented in the video. Start with the assumptions you most want to test:
Evidence in view
Follow an answer back to the analyst's explanation. Check the timeframe, qualifications and evidence around the claim.
A valuation question with a genuine answer identifying the speaker's assumptions. Beside it, show the video paused at a cited explanation. Label the source date.
Ask which growth, margin or valuation assumptions the speaker discusses, then inspect the cited reasoning.
A question about downside risks, with a concise cited answer and the source passage. Show actual risks discussed by the speaker; do not invent company-specific claims.
Focus on risks and weaknesses rather than letting them disappear inside a broad recap of the video.
Custom Question input asking which catalysts the analyst discusses over the next 12 months. Include the selected source title and date.
Ask what the analyst expects, when they expect it and what conditions they attach to that view.
A company Knowledge Hub with two contrasting analyst videos. Show a comparison question and a result with clearly distinguished source citations, using real evidence.
Bring competing views into a Knowledge Hub and compare the arguments with references back to each source.
A valuation question with a genuine answer identifying the speaker's assumptions. Beside it, show the video paused at a cited explanation. Label the source date.
A question about downside risks, with a concise cited answer and the source passage. Show actual risks discussed by the speaker; do not invent company-specific claims.
A company Knowledge Hub with two contrasting analyst videos. Show a comparison question and a result with clearly distinguished source citations, using real evidence.
Two analysts can reach different conclusions about the same stock. Build a company Knowledge Hub to ask where their reasoning diverges.
Simple pricing
Use your 40 starter credits after email verification to try the workflow. Review the estimate before generating an answer.
$0forever
Try a question about one company's analysis.
$16per month10% off
Build a regular company-research routine.
$26per month20% off
Maintain more company Hubs and research more sources.
Prices in USD. Paid plans include monthly credits. Your credit estimate is shown before you generate.
Bring a stock-analysis video. Ask about the thesis behind the headline. Review the evidence and form your own view.
Already have an account? Log in
This workflow researches the content of the videos you add. Prices, targets and forecasts discussed in an older video are not live market data.
Yes. Add analysed videos to a company Knowledge Hub and ask about differences in their arguments, assumptions or risks.
No. It identifies where the target was discussed so you can inspect the explanation. Assessing the investment case remains your decision.