Why Mid-Page Rankings Are the Real Prize
The most compelling insight in this technique isn't the edit itself—it's the arithmetic of where you sit in Google's results. Matt, an SEO consultant with a decade of experience helping brands grow traffic, points to click-through-rate data showing that the first result on Google captures a 45.8% click-through rate, while position 10 manages just 1.42%. The drop-off between the top of the page and the bottom of page one is steep enough that a few positions of movement can transform a page's traffic.
That math is why he focuses on keywords ranking between positions 5 and 15 rather than chasing hopeless page-two terms or untouchable number-one spots. As a worked example, he calculates that a page in position 10 getting about 10 clicks per month would, all things being equal, pull 68 clicks per month at position five—a sevenfold gain—and 318 clicks at position one. Compounded across every page sitting in that 5-to-15 band, the cumulative effect can be substantial.
The 'Three Kings' of On-Page Signals
The edit itself is deliberately simple. Matt's technique has three steps: identify keywords where your site ranks between positions 5 and 15, choose a target keyword, and inject that keyword into what SEOs call the 'three kings'—the title tag, the H1 tag, and the first sentence or paragraph of body copy. These, he explains, are the three key spots Google looks to when detecting what a page is about.
He demonstrates the pattern on real ranking pages. Investopedia's page on 'what is the stock market' includes the keyword in its URL, title tag, H1, and an immediate definition; Wix's 'how to design a logo' result does the same. He cautions, though, that including the keyword in the URL and meta description is optional—meta descriptions aren't necessarily ranking factors since Google rewrites many of them anyway—though it costs little if you're already editing the title tag.
He's also careful not to oversell the mechanism. Asked whether placing keywords in these spots will shoot a page up the rankings, he says of course he can't guarantee that—but he argues with confidence that omitting them likely confuses Google's algorithm and wastes clicks and impressions.
Executing the Refresh in Google Search Console
The workflow starts in Google Search Console, a free tool where you open Search Results under Performance, tick the average position box, and filter for positions greater than 4.9. That surfaces every keyword sitting in the target range. Clicking a keyword reveals which page those queries lead to, and disabling the query filter shows all the searches bringing people to that page.
Choosing a target keyword from Search Console has a distinctive advantage, Matt argues: unlike third-party keyword tools, the data comes straight from Google, with the clicks and impressions to prove real traffic exists behind those queries. It's a balancing act, though—the highest-traffic keyword isn't always right if it doesn't match the page's scope or your business goals. In his demo on his niche site composercode.com, 'how to write a good song' both encapsulated the blog post and had the highest clicks and impressions, so it won.
The actual fix took him roughly 20 to 30 seconds: update the title tag, add the keyword to the meta description, and—since his H1 automatically mirrors the title tag—the work was done. He then copies the URL into Search Console's URL inspection tool and requests indexing, asking Google to send its robots back to recrawl the page rather than waiting on a crawl schedule that could take weeks. The process then repeats for every keyword in the 5-to-15 range.
When the Quick Fix Isn't Enough
What if you check back after a week or two and nothing has changed? Matt says that may be a signal to go back to the drawing board with the content itself. His first principle of on-page optimization: make sure your page intent matches the search engine results page intent. His example: a SaaS company trying to rank a features page for 'integrated development environment' would face top results that are all informational—'what is an IDE' articles—creating a mismatch that requires either reformatting the content or picking a different keyword. Unless you're a highly authoritative site, he warns, you're swimming against the tide.
His second recommendation is to study the top three ranking results 'like a scientist'—every pixel, every H2 and H3, every chart—so your content is just as good if not better. If theirs runs 2,000 words, that's probably a sign the topic takes 2,000 words; if they include subject matter expert quotes, you probably need some too. For a faster, more systematic approach, he recommends Surfer SEO, a paid tool he says he uses daily with clients—it analyzes competitor content and suggests improvements like image counts and missing 'natural language processing' keywords such as 'chord progression'—while noting he isn't paid or sponsored to say so.
And if you've done all of that and still aren't ranking? He says there's a high chance you need more backlinks—a topic he points viewers to a separate video to explore.
The Broader Lesson: Small Levers, Real Evidence
What makes this technique worth a general reader's attention isn't the promise of '10x traffic'—it's the method behind it. Matt's client story illustrates the pitch: with mediocre outsourced content and limited time in month one or two of the engagement, he applied the three-kings edits across all the client's pages, and rankings rose with featured snippets won. That bought enough time to do a full content refresh later.
The underlying principle extends beyond SEO tactics: use first-party data to find where you're close to winning, make the smallest change that clarifies your signal, and verify with evidence rather than assumption. The technique is presented as the first thing Matt does with any new client because gains can appear immediately—but his own caveats about intent matching, content quality, and backlinks make clear it's a starting point, not a complete strategy.
Charts & Visual Insights
Theoretical Monthly Clicks by Google Position
For an example page getting about 10 clicks per month in position 10, the presenter calculates 68 clicks per month in position 5 and 318 clicks in position 1, all things being equal.
| Google position | Monthly clicks | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Position 10 | 10 | |
| Position 5 | 68 | |
| Position 1 | 318 |
Note: Clicks are the presenter's theoretical calculations based on stated CTR figures, not measured results.